Decommissioning and Disposal of Health Facilities and Health Technology
Please help to expand this page. |
Contents
- 1 OVERVIEW
- 2 POLICY AND SERVICE CONTEXT
- 3 PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING AND RETROFITTING
- 4 PART D - SYSTEMS AND UNIT SPECIFIC DECOMMISIONING - 20 -
- 4.1 1. Radiology facilities - 20 -
- 4.2 1.1. Decommissioning of Radiology equipment - 20 -
- 4.3 2. Laboratory facilities - 22 -
- 4.4 3. Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Nursing department and Isolation Facilities - 23 -
- 4.5 4. Filtration Media - 24 -
- 4.6 5. Wet services - 25 -
- 4.7 6. Information technology infrastructure - 25 -
- 4.8 7. General building and administration facilities - 25 -
- 4.9 8. Decommissioning and Disposal of Health Technology Equipment - 27 -
- 5 PART E - EXAMPLE WORKSHEETS AND CHECKLISTS AND PROTOCOLS - 30 -
- 5.1 1. Checklist: Infrastructure Decommissioning and Disposal - 30 -
- 5.2 2. Decommissioning Decision Record - 36 -
- 5.3 3. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS’s) must: - 37 -
- 5.4 4. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF CHEMICAL WASTE - 38 -
- 5.5 5. Treatment and Disposal of Radioactive Waste - 40 -
- 5.6 6. List of Abbreviations - 43 -
- 5.7 7. List of Definitions - 44 -
- 5.8 8. References - 45 -
OVERVIEW
This document outlines the policy and service context and attempts to illustrate the desired planning principles and design considerations for Decommissioning and Disposal of Healthcare Infrastructure and Health Care Technology.
- Part A outlines the national and provincial service and policy context which are the basic determinants of the decommissioning principles;
- Part B contains planning guidance and considerations;
- Part C develops these principles into a series of departmental requirements;
- Part D contains example worksheets and checklists and protocols
- Parts C, D and E are intended to demonstrate how the principles prescribed in Part B can be applied in worked examples. Parts C or D, if used directly, are deemed to satisfy the principles developed in Part B, but are not the only acceptable solutions.
While this document outlines design requirements and acceptance criteria which have an impact on clinical services, these requirements are prescribed within the framework of the entire IUSS set of guidance documents and cannot be viewed in isolation. The following documents should be complied with, together with this document:
POLICY AND SERVICE CONTEXT
Introduction
Healthcare systems are dynamic and constantly changing. Amongst other changes, there are changes in healthcare infrastructure and healthcare technology to meet socio-economic needs and emerging medical requirements.
Healthcare infrastructure is constantly being adapted to meet a population’s healthcare needs. Such adaptation requires alteration of physical infrastructure and construction of new infrastructure. During the alteration or construction of new infrastructure part of or entire old infrastructure becomes redundant and need to be removed from service by decommissioning to be either re-used for other purposes or disposed of.
Health Technology is constantly changing and evolving. This change results in a short life-cycle compared to fixed healthcare infrastructure. Such changes result in old technology being removed from service and posing a health and occupational risk if not properly decommissioned. Health Technology which is out of service might even be re-commissioned for use at less demanding facilities, upgraded or disposed of.
This document provides guidance on procedures to be followed in decommissioning and disposal of healthcare infrastructure and health technology.
Healthcare facilities can generate two distinct waste streams. This document deals only with the waste generated in the decommissioning process and not with the waste generated from the operational waste stream. The terms waste, healthcare waste and healthcare risk waste in this document therefore only refers to forms of decommissioning waste.
Mothballing exists as an alternative to decommissioning. This document does not detail or discuss the requirements and protocols for mothballing.
Regulations, Guidelines, Standards and Definitions
Standards
- This document should be read in the context of the SANS 10248-1 Management of healthcare waste Part 1: Management of healthcare risk waste from a healthcare facility
- The ISO 14001 is the international standard for environmental management of activities
- SANS 10234: 2008 Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS)
Guidelines
- The Western Cape Guideline for Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) 2005 gives guidance on the development of an EMP for the decommissioning phase of the facility life cycle.
- World Bank’s (1999) EMP Guidelines
- The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry’s EMP Guidelines (CSIR, 2002)
- DEAT Framework for Health Care Waste Management (May 2000)
- Department of Water Affairs & Forestry, 2005. Waste Management Series. Minimum Requirements for the Handling, Classification and Disposal of Hazardous Waste.
Acts and Regulations
- Public Finance Management Act No.1 1999
- Hazardous Substances Act 15 of 1973 and its amendments
- National Environmental Waste Management: Waste Act 59 of 2008, and its amendments
- National Waste Classification and Management Regulations R634 of 2013
- National Waste Information Regulations R625 of 2012
- Regulation R1332 of 3 August 1973 Regulations Concerning the Control of Electronic Products
- Nuclear Energy Act, 1999 (Act 46 of 1999).
- Standard for Infrastructure Procurement and Delivery Management (2016)
Definitions
Healthcare infrastructure, healthcare infrastructure in this document refers to hospital facilities, buildings, wet services, cold and hot water systems, electrical reticulations, Air-conditioning system (HVAC and all its components, split-units and other ventilation systems), plant equipment, catering equipment, IT equipment and any other systems and equipment which form part of the hospital facilities.
Health technology, health technology in this document refers to medical equipment and/or devices, their accessories and any component(s) and or system which may provide a link between equipment and/or devices which is used in healthcare for the purpose of preventing, diagnosing, or treating diseases as well as for monitoring and rehabilitation.
PLANNING FOR DECOMMISSIONING AND RETROFITTING
Background
While engineering systems and components may have a functional life of less than 25 years, healthcare buildings could have a life approaching 50 years. It is therefore likely that equipment and services would need to be decommissioned, retrofitted, revitalised and replaced at least once during the life of a building and these interventions should be planned for.
Projects with a retrofitting element shall include for the formal decommissioning of equipment or services which become redundant or obsolete as a result of the retrofitting project or can be conveniently decommissioned within the project. Decommissioning of any assets shall be undertaken in accordance with the Public Finance Management Act, Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, Companies Act and Good Corporate Governance Practice.
When planning for retrofitting and decommissioning, consideration should be given to the following aspects: • Establishment of a disposal management committee. • Development of and compliance with an Environmental Management Plan (EMP). • Development and implementation of a risk assessment and hazard control plan. • Assignment of a clinician and IPC manager with authority to approve or halt construction activities only under defined conditions. • Power requirements of future expansions and installations. • Emerging healthcare technologies. • Space for removal and refitting of equipment. • Potential and planning for recycling vs disposal of materials. • Toxicity and environmental impact of gasses, paints and polymers. • Specific healthcare services risks (IPC etc). • Occupational Health and Safety Regulations and requirements.
Contamination Control and Risk Planning
A project risk assessment shall be conducted and consider the following aspects • Identification of occupancy groups which are susceptible to risks. • Identification of building services, such as ventilation, in the proximity of the construction activity and the potential impact on function. Specific consideration should be given to specialist ventilation systems. • Need for supplementary protection or support systems for building services. • Impact on fire protection and response systems and action plans. • Impact of noise and vibration on occupants and equipment. Opportunistic environmental or airborne microorganisms, allergens or hazardous materials which are liberated or distributed during retrofitting and decommissioning activities, can present a significant hazard to patients and employees unusually at risk. Where the environmental assessments and risk assessments identify the need for intervention or mitigating controls, the precautionary matrix described under the heading Contamination Control Risk Planning below shall be considered in determining risk levels. The principles of contamination control for high risk sites includes the following:
- Establishment of rigid non-permeable barriers, between patient or staff and construction activities, during construction with the inclusion of appropriate clean-down ante-rooms where traffic between occupied and construction areas is required.
- Increased ventilation rates with high ventilation efficiency to areas at risk.
- Extraction and filtration systems serving the construction area. Where there is chance of re-entrainment of diluted exhausted air, a minimum of an EN779-F9 filter should be installed as the final filtration stage. Where air is actively recirculated it should be filtered with at least an EN1822-H13 final filter.
- Establishing a protective pressure cascade or airflow from clean to contaminated zones
With acknowledgement to Nicholas Thorne (Life Healthcare), the following construction risk matrixes provide guidance on undertaking construction, maintenance, retrofitting and decommissioning work, whilst maintaining functionality and safety in a working healthcare facility. PROCEDURE: Locate risk profile by space-type using the tabel below:
LOW RISK | MODERATE RISK | HIGH RISK | HIGHEST RISK |
|
|
|
|
TYPE | ACTIVITIES |
---|---|
TYPE A | Inspection and Non-Invasive Activities Includes, but is not limited to:
|
TYPE B | Small scale, short duration activities which create minimal dust Includes, but is not limited to:
|
TYPE C | Work that generates a moderate to high level of dust or requires demolition or removal of any fixed building components or assemblies
Includes, but is not limited to:
|
TYPE D | Major demolition and construction projects
Includes, but is not limited to:
|
TYPE | LOW RISK | MODERATE RISK | HIGH RISK | HIGHEST RISK |
---|---|---|---|---|
TYPE A
(Non-Invasive/Inspection) |
I | II | II | III/IV |
TYPE B
(Minimal Dust) |
I | II | III | IV |
TYPE C
(Moderate Dust) |
I | II | III/IV | IV |
TYPE D
(Major Demolition) |
II | III/IV | III/IV | IV |
Precautionary Measures Before and During Activity | Precautionary Measures Upon Completion of Activity | |
---|---|---|
Class I |
|
|
Class II |
|
|
Class III |
|
|
Class IV |
|
|
Identification and responsible disposal of hazardous and toxic materials
Identification of Hazardous Materials
Hazardous Decommissioning Waste Segregation
On-site Storage of Hazardous Decommissioning Waste
Disposal of Hazardous Waste
Minimisation of waste
The 4 R’S:
What to Recycle
Materials Separation
PART D - SYSTEMS AND UNIT SPECIFIC DECOMMISIONING - 20 -
1. Radiology facilities - 20 -
1.1. Decommissioning of Radiology equipment - 20 -
2. Laboratory facilities - 22 -
3. Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Nursing department and Isolation Facilities - 23 -
4. Filtration Media - 24 -
5. Wet services - 25 -
6. Information technology infrastructure - 25 -
7. General building and administration facilities - 25 -
8. Decommissioning and Disposal of Health Technology Equipment - 27 -
PART E - EXAMPLE WORKSHEETS AND CHECKLISTS AND PROTOCOLS - 30 -
1. Checklist: Infrastructure Decommissioning and Disposal - 30 -
No | Question | Commentary/Why is this important |
---|---|---|
1 | Have you notified affected providers and offered to meet to explain the rationale and process? | Engaging with affected providers throughout the process is not only good practice may mitigate a legal challenge to the process and decisions at a later stage. |
2 | Have you analysed the outcome of any such meetings? | Following your meeting (or other form of communication) with the provider you should be able to answer and document the following
what is their response? do they want to keep strictly to the terms of the contract? is there any indication of their willingness to agree to a variation in the contractual terms? |
3 | Have the providers in question attended any workshops that you have run on outcomes bases service/ infrastructure? | If not then they may not be able to understand the change in policy, direction and the context for service delivery. Analyse this and if necessary provide and communicate relevant information. |
4 | Having gone through these stages, what is your assessment of the provider’s attitude and the chances of reaching a negotiated solution? | It will be important to take stock at regular intervals through the process and to analyse and adjust plans according to the responses and attitudes of provider(s). The objective should always be to reach a negotiated position. |
5 | Is the provider inflexible? | If no negotiated solution can be found and the provider intends to stick strictly to the terms of the contract, and the contract does not provide any of the flexibility required to achieve services of the required nature, then a risk assessment and impact analysis should be undertaken. |
6 | Do you need to undertake a risk assessment and impact analysis? | This should include:
a cost/benefit analysis Impact of decommissioning the service - effect on service users, provider organisation and on your ability to deliver services. |
7 | What is the advice of your legal department? | The facility owner’s legal department should be involved in the process. |
No | Question | Commentary/Why is this important? |
---|---|---|
1 | What will be the cost of decommissioning a service/ infrastructure? | This needs to be considered in terms of the potential cost (e.g. breaching or buying out a contract) if the consequences of continuing with the existing contract is limiting or risky in terms of performance or service quality. |
2 | What will the cost be of not decommissioning the service? | Against this needs to be set the adverse effect on performance judgement if the facility is not making progress with policy initiatives, or is not taking incisive action over services that can be considered of an adequate quality but may be of a poor or outdated service model. |
3. | If a provider is completely inflexible have you considered working and discussing this with other facilities that do business with them? | This may help a provider to reconsider their stance and enter into discussion and negotiation to find common ground and agreed solutions. |
No | Question | Commentary/Why is this important? |
---|---|---|
1 | What is the quality of the service/ infrastructure? | Is service quality good or acceptable? Is there a risk that if the contract is changed then it might deteriorate? It is important to pay particular attention to process quality (i.e. the service user experience of receiving the service) |
2 | How effective is the service/ infrastructure, particularly in terms of outcomes? Or has the service/ infrastructure service got the potential and adaptability to be effective in terms of outcomes? | Although the service may not at this point be delivering the outcomes required you need to apply your analytical skills to evaluate whether the service, if changed, has the potential to be effective. |
3 | Is performance, against agreed measurables, meeting the requirements of, and standards set out in, the service specification? | If this is the case it will bode well for future delivery and effectiveness of services, taken together with other factors that will be looked at as part of any decommissioning / re-commissioning / re-tendering process. |
4 | Is the demand for the service/ infrastructure commensurate with the service/ infrastructure that the facility is committed to paying for (particularly if this is locked into a block contract)? | If there is no longer the demand for the service, or if the block purchasing of services need to be reduced within the contract period due to the development and implementation of the personalisation agenda, then consider whether there is scope for negotiating with the provider on this point. |
5 | Do you need to terminate a current contract?
Have you sought advice from legal and contract service/ infrastructure? |
Has the provider unilaterally changed any elements of the service, withdrawn service or failed to provide services that it is contractually bound to do to any significant or substantial degree?
If any of these apply then they can be used as leverage to either ensure compliance or to get the provider to become more flexible and responsive to change contractual requirements. |
6 | Where you terminate a contract:
Are you able to develop decommissioning / transfer / transition plans in conjunction with the provider? |
This is vital to effect a smooth transfer and to minimise the impact on service users and staff. |
7 | Have you got a communication plan? | It is important to communicate well in advance with service users and the press / media, as well as other stakeholders. |
8 | Have you briefed elected members and other key stakeholders?
Who else should you inform or consult with? - Link to stakeholder engagement section |
It is important to brief anybody within the governance structure, other stakeholders who might be affected, or where there might be an impact on other services |
9 | Have you developed a decommissioning / transition / transfer plan? | This should be managed by a programme/project management approach:-Link to decommissioning / transition / transfer plan |
10 | Have you considered future contracts to ensure that they do not constrain you unduly? | Your contracts may need to be revised to be more flexible and include scope for periodically revising the service specification. Legal advice should be sought and examples sought from other facility. |
Serial Number: - |
Model: - |
Manufacturer: - |
---|---|---|
Description: - |
Installation Date: - |
Decommissioning date: - |
Acceptance Check |
Comment | Pass (yes/no) |
Is equipment documentation available (acceptance certificate, calibration certificates, service records and final tests) | ||
Hazardous material exposure possible? (Biological, chemical, radioactive and others) | ||
Decontamination procedure | ||
Does the equipment planned maintenance schedule exist | ||
Has the equipment been tested for electrical safety | ||
Does the equipment pass all of the above conditions | ||
Will the equipment be disposed or re-used for other/laboratory purposes | ||
Make sure that all hazards material are disposed as per the disposal procedure for all equipment due for disposal and all equipment to be reused should comply with regulations and license requirements. |
Building Number - |
Room Number - | |||||||||||
License Number - |
||||||||||||
Acceptance Check | Comment | Pass (yes/no) | ||||||||||
Inform the department of health of the intended decommissioning of the LAB | ||||||||||||
Decontaminate the room(s) and all exposed facilities of all the hazards? | ||||||||||||
Will the room(s) be disposed or re-used for other purposes? | ||||||||||||
Make sure that all hazards material are disposed as per the disposal procedure and all rooms to be reused should comply with regulations and license requirements. |
Serial Number: - |
Model: - | |||||||||||
Manufacturer - |
Description | |||||||||||
Installation Date - |
Decommissioning date - | |||||||||||
Acceptance Check | Comment | Pass (yes/no) | ||||||||||
Is equipment documentation presented (acceptance certificate, service record, final test ) | ||||||||||||
Decontaminate the room(s) and all exposed facilities of all the hazards? | ||||||||||||
Reason for decommissioning? | ||||||||||||
Is the equipment functional? | ||||||||||||
Is the equipment CE marked? | ||||||||||||
Is the equipment class and type indicated? | ||||||||||||
Does equipment have the instruction manual? | ||||||||||||
Does the equipment pass all of the above conditions? | ||||||||||||
Will the equipment be disposed or re-used for medical purposes? | Make sure that all hazards material are disposed as per the disposal procedure for all equipment due for disposal and all equipment to be reused should comply with regulations and licence requirements. | |||||||||||
Make sure that all hazards material are disposed as per the disposal procedure for all equipment due for disposal and all equipment to be reused should comply with regulations and licence requirements. |