Materials and finishes

Context

Overview – finishes in the healthcare environment

Interior finishes play a vital role in a healthcare facility, as proper wall treatments can contribute to the creation and maintenance of a positive therapeutic environment for patients (Mayer, 2005)

Building finishes account for a large proportion of the overall cost of constructing a healthcare facility. According to Shohet et al. (2002),    interior finishing and interior construction account for 32% of the initial budget. Maintenance and cleaning of finishes add substantially to the ‘whole-life costs’ of finishes within a hospital or healthcare facility.  

Despite this, finishes are often treated as optional and purely aesthetic components of the building and the spaces within it. When budget constraints are implemented, the finishes are usually the first area to suffer. Institutions will often standardise finishes across a spectrum of rooms/facilities for economy in replacement and/or cleaning regimes.  

Interior finishes, however, play a vital role in the health care environment, and contribute substantially to the delivery of healthcare service and the protection of staff and patients.  

In a study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) in association with the University of Sheffield and Queen Margaret University College, 2004, the comments from the majority of people who visited hospitals, including staff and patients, included “cold, depressing, dehumanising, Kafkaesque, dirty, smelly, frightening, impersonal, confusing, dull shabby, windowless, grim, stressful…” While the fact that most patients interviewed may have been negative as a result of their being ill, it does highlight a problem of the inhumane and threatening appearance of hospital environments “UNTIL THE GERM THEORY WAS DEVELOPED, (historically) where even more attention should be MORE MEN WERE DYING FROM SMALL paid to creating a caring atmosphere. WOUNDS AND DISEASES THAN FROM MAJOR TRAUMAS ON THE FRONTLINES. BUT AS SOON It is this paradigm shift that is required when AS GERM THEORY WAS DEVELOPED A WHOLE considering and selecting finishes. The role of finishes NEW PARADIGM, A BETTER WAY OF in a healthcare facility has become as important an UNDERSTANDING WHAT WAS HAPPENING aspect of design as room sizes and relationships.  

Building finishes are usually seen as a separate and final application to the building structure (Dean, 1996). There are, however, instances where the finish is integral to the structure. These documents therefore include finishes and materials in such cases.  

Suite of documents

This document forms part of a series of documents addressing internal materials and finishes in health facilities, which in turn form part of the suite of documents created under the IUSS Project. The aim of the Materials and Finishes Suite of Documents is to provide guidance on design and specification for the various building components where current legislation, including the National Building Regulations does not adequately cover suitability of finishes in the healthcare facility context.

While the guidelines speak mostly of new building work, most of the principles are consistent with refurbishment projects to existing buildings as well.

How to use this document:

1. Review the Selection Criteria - Part B
2. Select a Room / Department name in Part D, and note Performance Category
3. Refer to Table 1 for the Properties that make up that Performance category
4. Refer to Part C to assess ceiling types that could satisfy those performance requirements.

Other IUSS HEALTH FACILITY GUIDES in this series include:

• Internal Floor Finishes (draft document rev 5)
• Internal Wall Finishes (draft document rev 4)
• Joinery and Storage Systems (to follow)
• Doors and Ironmongery (to follow)
• Sanitary Ware (to follow)
• Signage and Wayfinding (to follow)

These guidelines are updated and revised periodically, and can be accessed at www.iussonline.co.za

The primary objective of this technical guide is to assist decision-makers with the selection of ’appropriate’ ceiling finishes in the health facility context.  

The guide looks at the context (Part A), then examines various selection criteria (Part B), then summarises technical information of various ceiling finishes (Part C) to assist with assessing the best finish for the facility. Finally, the selection criteria are grouped together to form performance categories (Part D) and a matrix of rooms with the most relevant performance category is indicated.

Policy context

This document offers guidance on the selection of appropriate ceiling finishes in health facilities. While the aim is to inform project and design teams about the wide range of considerations to take into account when selecting finishes, it does not diminish the responsibility of the design team to comply with all applicable professional and regulatory obligations and to specify materials and finishes ‘fit for purpose’.

Some of the pertinent regulations are as follows:

• National Building Regulations and Building Standards ACT, 1977 (Act 103 of 1977) amended 30 May 2008
• SANS 10400, Code of Practice for the application of the National Building Regulations, first rev. August 1990
• R158, Government Notice dated Feb 1980 (updated March 1993) Regulation pertaining to control of Private Hospitals, (revised 05 November 1996, but not gazetted)
• R187, Regulations Governing Private Health Establishments, Western Cape, 22 June 2001

The design principles on the above documents must be taken into account alongside the recommendations of this document. For example: Clause 32 of the R158 states under general requirements in the OT Unit that the ceiling must be dustproof, of smooth impervious material, painted white or light-coloured suitable washable paint.  

Furthermore, the South African National Standards (SANS 10400) addresses numerous aspects involving materials and finishes. (Refer to, among others - Parts J, K, L and T in respect of moisture penetration, fixing heights, structural stability and assembly.) Current South African National Standards applicable are as follows:

SANS 204 Energy-Efficiency in buildings general

SANS 622 Gypsum cove cornice

SANS 637 Wood-wood panels (cement-bonded)

SANS 640 Flexible PU-foams

SANS 803 Fibre cement boards

SANS 1039 Wooden ceiling and panelling boards

SANS 1381 Materials for thermal insulation boards

SANS 1508 Expanded polystyrene thermal insulation boards

SANS 1783 Softwood brandering and battens

SANS 6013 Dimensional and mass stability of particle boards with varying humidy

SANS 6016 Transverse tensile strength of particle boards

SANS10177 Fire-testing of materials

The Standard refers to the following definitions:

Other provincial policy documents are also applicable:

• KwaZulu-Natal, Department of Health Policy Document for the Design of Structural Installations, Rev.7, January 2013
• Eastern Cape Department of Roads and Public Works and Department of Health Hospital Design Guide, revised. August 2004

Selection Criteria

Scope

A ceiling in any facility forms the third dimension in any given room area, along with the walls and the floor, and it sometimes separates the roof space from the occupied area below. The manner in which the ceiling is finished will affect not only the acoustics, but also the aesthetics of a room. Certain materials also contribute to the thermal properties of a room.

Although ceilings are for the most part out of reach of hands and feet of everyday staff and patient traffic, and the microbial burden would seem to be somewhat reduced, airborne dust particles and fine moisture dispersal can still allow pathogens to gather on ceiling surfaces.  The ceiling can therefore have a role to play in infection prevention and control.

Ceilings are often the membrane onto which services such as lighting or air-conditioning, and a host of other fittings, are fixed, while obscuring unsightly services behind. These and other criteria will be discussed in more detail under Selection Criteria.  

Generally, the ceiling type falls into one of three types in terms of installation:

1. Actual Soffit of structure overhead – for example a concrete slab

While this type of installation will limit the flexibility of service outlets, it provides a solid structure where heavier fittings need to be attached to the ceiling. The finishes can range from off-shutter smooth concrete to plastered and painted surface treatment.

2. Membrane fixed directly to the structure overhead – for example a nail-up ceiling board

The compliance with SANS fire requirements for a noncombustible ceiling/roof structure will be paramount in determining what ceiling types (and subsequent structure) can be used here. There is the usefulness of the ceiling void above in this type of installation, with more flexibility here for service outlets to be changed if the ceiling is skimmed and painted on completion. Certain nail-up ceilings also have thermal properties in themselves and would not require a separate application of insulation.  

3. Membrane suspended from the structure overhead allowing a ceiling void above – for example a suspended grid ceiling

The suspended ceiling, especially if consisting of modular tiles – available in varying types, allows the most flexibility for positioning lights, ventilation and other services. Replacement of damaged areas is simple and there is easy access to the services running in the void making this option a common choice.

Each type gives rise to different options in terms of finishes and materials and each has its place in healthcare facilities.  

Environmental aspects in the choice of finishes

A guide of finishes would be incomplete without highlighting the environmental aspects in the choice of finishes.  

This is an extremely broad factor covering:

• Embodied energy of materials
• Life cycle costing/sustainability
• Toxicity and effects of indoor environment quality

Embodied energy of materials

The term embodied energy refers to the total energy measure required to manufacture a product. This includes:

• Harvesting/mining of the raw material
• Processing the material
• Manufacturing the product
• Transport/delivery of the product to the manufacturing plant, retail outlets and finally the end user
• Labour or mechanical energy spent on placing the product in its finished position  

Buying locally-produced materials is an easy and achievable way to lower embodied energy of a building. The table below gives an indication of the embodied energy of various typical building materials.  

Embodied energy of common ceiling materials (finish and substrates)

While health facility design may limit your selection of materials in terms of other performance factors, which are more critical, every opportunity to reduce the embodied energy of materials should be pursued. Manufacturers are increasingly aiming at reducing embodied energy, as well as the carbon footprint in the manufacture of their products.  

This is driven by the market demand and designers can contribute by choosing materials that support green initiatives in this regard.

Life cycle costing and sustainability

Life cycle costs are described as the social, economic and environmental costs of a material or product from cradle to grave – that is, from the

extraction of the raw ore needed to

make it, through the manufacturing, to the end use to disposal or

recycling. (Daniel D. Chiras. The

New Ecological Home, 2004)

The durability of materials is a key element in the life cycle cost assessment. A product may have a low embodied energy, but requires more frequent replacement in the building.  

Specifiers should investigate the service life of materials with the respective manufacturers, to establish its life span. This element should also be highlighted to funders who often place more emphasis on reducing the capital cost of a facility, without considering the long-term cost.   

The graph below indicates how capital outlay costs compare to life span costs – emphasising the importance of life cycle costs.

Sustainability should be considered in all four stages of product life:

• Manufacture
• Use
• Maintenance
• Disposal

The Green Building Council of South Africa has developed Green Star TM rating tools which will credit materials with the following:

• Reuse of existing material
• Recycling properties
• Local sourcing

As a practical example, and to indicate the benefit of comparing life cycle costing, the table alongside shows the comparative life cycle costs of various floor finishes - in this instance demonstrating the low life cycle costs of a rubber product, even though the installation cost for this product was the highest at the outset.

Toxicity and effect on indoor environment

Indoor Environment Quality (IEQ) is one of the nine categories of the Green Building Council of South Africa’s Green Star TM Rating Tools. These rating tools are used to assess environmental performance of a building and/or materials and through improvement in IEQ, the wellbeing of the occupant is protected.  

VOCs can cause irritation and odour annoyance and could lead to behavioral,neurotoxic, hemotoxic and genotoxic effects (Meininghaus et al., 2000;

Hoskins, 2003; Hodgson et al., 2000)

IEQ is measured in terms of:

• Internal noise levels (this is discussed in more detail under Selection Criteria: Acoustics)  
• Mould prevention (this is discussed in more detail under Section Criteria: Humidity)
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Materials such as paints and polyvinylchlorides can emit VOCs (gasses) when finishes are new and these reduce over the life span of the product. Sealants and adhesives also give off VOCs, having a negative effect on indoor air quality.  

According to Hoskins (2003), VOCs can be carcinogenic, depending on the compound. When considering the toxic impact on the environment in which the various ceiling finishes will be installed, the finish as a whole - complete with painted or surface finish, substrate material and any adhesives used – must be taken into account.

A further important aspect to consider is the use of non-toxic materials in mental health facilities, where patients are prone to chew and ingest any materials that can be uplifted off surfaces, from paint to flooring, to ceiling panels where these are within reach.

Every effort must be made when specifying materials and finishes in these facilities to ensure that materials and their junctions are wellsecured and cannot be peeled back or picked off by patients. The toxicity of the material content should also be clarified with manufacturers to ensure that these materials are safe and fit for this purpose.

Evidence-based design  

Determining which criteria to apply when selecting finishes appropriate for health facilities could be very subjective. However, in recent years, there have been substantial advances made by various researchers in providing scientific evidence for the impact of the healthcare environment on healthcare outcomes. Many studies, such as Ulrich et al. (2008) demonstrated connections between the design of facilities and the effect on patients, staff and the public utilising healthcare buildings. This has led to a growing understanding of what are priorities in designing health facilities:

Extensive research by The Centre for Health Design (CHD) Research Coalition on Evidence-based Design literature led to the Evidence-based Design Glossary, (Phase 1 Report Healthcare Environmental Terms and Outcome Measures) November 2011.

Various unrelated research papers were gathered with interesting results. These included the following:

• Environmental factors influencing the contamination of inanimate surfaces (including interior finish materials of flooring and furniture as well as surface cleaning methods) Anderson, Mackle, Stoler and Mallison 1982, and Lankford, Collins, Youngberg, Rooney, Warren and Noskin 2006)

• Reducing background noise in operating theatres and the impact on surgical errors (Moorthy, Munz, Dosis, Bann and Darzi, 2003)
• Multiple environmental factors affecting patient fall rates (Calkins, Biddle and Biesan, 2011 and Becker et al., 2003)
• Patient satisfaction with quality of care when sound-reflecting ceiling tiles were replaced with sound-absorbing tiles to reduce noise (Hagerman and Colleagues, 2005)
• Positive visual distractions including windows, nature photographs, etc. and the effect on patients restless behaviour in waiting rooms (Nanda, 2010, Pati and Nanda, 2011)
• Nurses’ exposure to daylight correlating to job satisfaction (Alimoglu and Donmez, 2005)
• Noise as a source of stress and its negative impact on staff (Morrison, Haas, Shaffner, Garett and Fackler, 2003)
• Textile materials containing microbial agents (Takai et al., 2002)

• Aesthetic appeal and its effect on patient and staff satisfaction and patient waiting (Becker and Douglass, 2008)

Arising out of an overview of these studies, the following selection criteria have been identified:

• Infection prevention
• Cleaning and maintenance
• Safety
• Indoor air quality -  humidity
• Indoor air quality - emissions
• Acoustics
• Aesthetics

Although all these factors are important, the specific functions of each space or room will re-order the priority of fulfilling each aspect. To assist with establishing these priorities and assessing the effects of each criterion, these are examined in more detail in the next section.  

Selection criteria

Infection prevention

The South African Patients’ Rights Charter (1997) states: “Everyone has the right to a healthy and safe environment that will ensure their physical and mental health or well-being including … protection from all forms of environmental danger, such as pollution, ecological degradation or infection.”

According to a survey conducted by Rohde (2002), materials and finishes have in the past been selected according to the following characteristics in declining order of importance: Aesthetics, durability, ease of maintenance, client preference, initial cost, cost of maintenance, infection control, ease of installation and life cycle cost.

Selecting the correct finish is a complex process with many aspects to consider, and the many and varied room types in a health facility extend the options. However, in healthcare facilities, the importance of the effect of a particular finish on the prevention of infection control must be prioritised.

While it is understood that not every area of a hospital or health facility will carry infection prevention as the highest priority, this aspect remains the most pressing issue in selection of finishes in health facilities.  

The rising incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in hospital and medical facilities supports the view that the selection of materials must first address infection prevention. This impacts the choice of materials in two aspects. The first is whether the surfaces are likely to become reservoirs for infectious agents. This is a function of the surface conditions and structure of the ceiling material. The second is the ability to clean the finish, and this is discussed further in the next section.

The Centre for Disease Control in the United States quoted statistics in 2010 of one out of every 20 hospitalised patients contracting HAIs, particularly in relation to sepsis and pneumonia.  

Although there is no known direct evidence linking HAIs in patients to particular finishes, there have been numerous studies conducted on microbial counts on floor finishes – particularly in soft textiles such as carpets. Beyer and Belsito (2000) proved that carpet acted as a reservoir for fungi and bacteria.

Anderson et al. (1982) also carried also carried out microbiological studies comparing patient rooms with and without carpet. The study found higher microbial counts and more E.coli and other organisms on carpet samples than bare floors.

While this issue may not affect the selection of a ceiling finish, there are principles to be borne in mind when establishing what finish is best in high-risk environments.

Below is a table adapted from NSW Health: Infection Control Policy (PD 2007-035), which sets out patient risk categories:

When selecting finishes for a room/area that has an extreme or high infection control risk, special care has to be taken to select an appropriate finish.  Although ceilings are out of reach and therefore less affected by regular touching, airborne bacteria can be carried on circulating mechanical ventilation, and aerosol contaminants which are distributed when water is splashed, (Ayliffe et al., 2000) can carry pathogens to ceiling level.

Ceiling materials and finishes that resist the spread of infection will have qualities that can be summarised as follows:

• Smooth
• Impervious
• Joint-less/seamless

On the opposite side of this spectrum, where infection prevention is the lowest priority, ceilings will have the following properties:

• Textured
• Perforated
• Jointed

Certain materials have been shown to inhibit bacterial growth – such as vinyl,  PuR and natural materials such as cork. This will also contribute to the prevention of infection. Ceilings with these properties will have the following quality:

• Bacteriostatic  

A note about anti-bacterial treatments and additives to ceiling products:

Some manufacturers tout the additional benefit of anti-microbial treatment in paints or grout to combat bacteria. The use of antimicrobial additives in the built environment is growing, for example - the impregnation of wood framing with silver nitrate to prevent microbial and mould growth, and extend the life span of the wood.

Synthetic fibres such as polypropylene textile and vinyl for example, in themselves do no provide a nutrient source which microbes need to survive, but some finishes can trap soil, dust and moisture which do provide that source.

The CDC HICPAC guidelines (CDC 2003) indicate that there is no evidence that antimicrobial-impregnated articles will prevent disease. There is a need for further research on products treated with these chemicals in terms of their potential risks and benefits to healthcare users.

6. Cleaning and maintenance

Connected with infection prevention is the issue of cleaning. Ceilings tend to have ’reactive’ cleaning regimes, rather than regular cleaning programmes. This is partially because the ceiling gives an impression of cleanliness, but this can be misleading.

Whether the materials/finish of a ceiling can be cleaned thoroughly will define the extent to which infectious agents can be prevented from multiplying on a surface. Some materials can tolerate a reasonable amount of moisture, facilitating regular washing, while others would be adversely affected by it and can only be dusted or wiped.

For cleaning to be effective, the surface must be able to withstand regular and fairly vigorous cleaning, with proper access to all surfaces. Where there are small recesses or difficult to reach corners, dirt is easily trapped providing dark, undisturbed conditions – the perfect breeding area for bacteria.  

Information regarding cleaning materials should also be considered, as solvents and cleaning agents can quickly cause deterioration of the finish if it is not robust enough to withstand the cleaning required.

A further aspect to consider is the disruption that will be required to carry out the cleaning regime and possible maintenance. This is pertinent to areas such as operating theatres that may remain in use 24 hours a day.

Where there is a high requirement for regular cleaning of a ceiling in view of its location in a sensitive area, together with a need for minimal disruption for maintenance, the ceiling properties could be summarised as:

•       Washable

•       Low maintenance

An additional consideration in the selection of ceiling finishes in health facilities in terms of maintenance is the provision of access to services in the ceiling void. Health facilities will generally require a high concentration of various services, most of which run in the ceiling void.

This will include electrical power and lighting, data, nurse call systems, medical gas and  vacuum lines, air-conditioning and extract ducts, as well as hot water and waste pipes to name a few. Although service ducts and shafts can alleviate this congestion in the ceiling, distribution on the horizontal plane will nonetheless be required.

By selecting ceiling types that cater for easy access and giving thought to the best positions for these access panels - even marking these panels where necessary - this will facilitate easier maintenance

of in-ceiling services during the life span of the building. This in turn

FIGURE 15 will reduce ’downtime’, and disruption of the health facility.

While the location of access panels is determined by the layout of services, certain rooms or areas will be more

•       No combustible materials are permitted in ceilings or roof structures for buildings classified as hospitals.

•       Medical facilities and healthcare categories are classified separately and have different requirements.

•       Strict parameters are given for the depth of ceiling voids and this is related to the need for sprinklers when the voids exceed a given depth.

•       Compartmentalisation of the ceiling void is required in area and distance, with fire stops.

•       A dedicated section is written regarding operating theatres and intensive, high and critical care units, stipulating 120 min fire resistance for division separations.

•       A full list of materials deemed to be non-combustible is provided.

suitable for these panels.

This has been listed as the property:

•       Access panels

6.1. Safety

Unlike floors which can prevent - or contribute to - falls by patients and staff, ceilings are largely out of reach and need not be assessed for safety as is relevant to floors. The safety aspect of fire performance does however need to be highlighted. The SANS 10400 lists specific requirements for hospitals and medical facilities with regard to ceilings. This is aimed at protecting the patients who are most likely frail, may not be able to walk, and would require assistance and more time to escape in the event of fire.

The definitions in the SANS 10400: Part A read:

•       E2 Hospital

Occupancy where people are cared for or treated because of physical or mental disabilities, and where they are generally bedridden.

•       E3  Other institutional (residential)

Occupancy where groups of people who either are not fully fit, or who are restricted in their movements or their ability to make decisions, reside and are cared for.

•       E4 Healthcare

Occupancy which is a common place of long term or transient living for a number of unrelated persons consisting of a single unit on its own site who, due to varying degrees of incapacity, are provided with personal care services or are undergoing medical treatment.

These requirements are set out in Part T of SANS 10400, and include:

All ceilings in hospitals would need to be non-combustible material.  In other health facilities, such as community health centres or clinics, there are exceptions to the non-combustible requirement, subject to compliance with certain conditions. Since each project varies, the advice of a competent fire engineer should be obtained.

Certain rooms and areas of health facilities are by nature of the function they house - wet spaces. These are spaces specifically used for the purpose of cleaning, washing, bathing or food preparation.  These rooms will generate more moisture than others, and as a result will require moisture-resistant finishes. If the ceiling panels or surfaces are hygroscopic, these finishes can be prone to mildew and mould growth. Surfaces must remain dry and clean in order to prevent the growth of fungus. (Hodgson et al., 2000)

Non-porous materials that do not absorb water are essential in these areas. These materials should also withstand regular cleaning, and should be able to withstand regular exposure to the moisture. Indoor air quality (IAQ) may be compromised by microbial contaminants such as mould, bacteria, allergens, chemicals, etc. in the air, which can affect the health of people. Where this is a requirement in a ceiling finish, this property will be listed as:

       •     High humidity

7.2. Emissions from materials

As discussed under Environmental Aspects, the kind of flooring installed can affect the environmental quality of the interior if VOCs are given off by – commonly referred to as off-gassing:

•       The product itself, along with its structure

•      

The adhesives used to fix the product or its layers  • The paints or sealants used to finish

with composite wood products. In addition, MAT-7 section recognises the reduction of PVC-products in the building materials used.

It should be noted that primary VOCs decline quickly in the short-term (<1 year), while secondary emissions can continue for the life span of the product, and should also be borne in mind when assessing this aspect of materials. Timing of the testing will yield very diverse results.

Proper moisture control is essential in order to reduce health risks and sick building syndrome in an enclosed space

Patients with respiratory weaknesses such as asthma are most likely to be affected by VOC emissions, and high-risk patients would benefit from materials that do not contribute to their condition. The ultimate goal of reducing emissions in the manufacture of building products should be to create a better and healthier environment for the patients and users of the facility. Materials such as paints and polyvinyl-chlorides can emit VOCs which can have a negative effect on indoor air quality.

According to Hoskins (2003), VOCs can be

carcinogenic, depending on the compound. VOCs can also cause irritation and odour annoyance, and could lead to behavioural, neurotoxic, hepatoxic and genotoxic effects (Meininghaus et al., 2000; Hoskins, 2003; Hodgson et al., 2000.)

However, the ‘order of magnitude’ should also be applied when using ‘low VOC emissions’ as a criterion to select finishes. The use of enamel paint on plaster, for example, may result in higher VOC emissions than say, a pre-finished lay-in ceiling board, but the infection control benefits of the seamless finish will outweigh the risks from VOC emissions. (More fatalities in patients have been linked to infection control issues than to VOC emissions issues.) Ceilings often present an opportunity to reduce the heat load on rooms from the roof space through insulation. This could form part of the ceiling material itself or be laid over the ceiling.

8. Acoustics

Noise in health facilities is mainly generated by:

•       Impact sounds e.g., pedestrian and wheeled equipment, bedrails moved up and down, doors closing and opening, footfalls, etc.

•       Airborne sounds, e.g., speech, medical equipment bleeps and alarms, nurse calls, PA system, etc.

Acoustical engineers at John Hopkins University found that average (continuous level equivalent, LA_eq) daytime hospital noise levels have risen from 57 dBA in 1960, to 72 dBA in 2006, with night-time sounds increasing from 42 dBA to 60 dBA over the same period. (Sound Practices: Noise Control in the Healthcare Environment – Research Summary, 2006, Herman Miller Healthcare). An average motorcycle noise level measures 85 dB.  The World Health Organization’s recommended LA_eq value for ward areas is 30 dBA.  

Studies have shown that high levels of noise have negative physical and psychological effects on patients, disrupting sleep, increasing stress and raising blood pressure levels (Cmiel et al., 2004). The University of Michigan released a news brief in November, 2005 showing that chronic noise increased the risk of heart-attack in patients by 50% for men and 75% for women. The negative effect of chronic noise extends to staff as well. While the presence of electronic devices and healthcare apparatus, designed to give audible signals and alarms to the nursing staff of the patient’s vital signs, architects and health facility planners need to make an effort to minimise this effect of noise and alarm fatigue.

Long straight passages are perfect echo corridors, often amplifying noises. Disturbances in the sound path help limit the sound transmission, for example by creating steps in the ceiling level or changes of direction in the passageways.

Nurses’ stations during shift change are areas where noise levels can reach those similar to jack-hammer levels, according to Cmiel, et al. 2004). Consideration should be given to applying acoustic materials to these areas to maximise sound absorption where possible.  

Recesses to accommodate noisy equipment can also be treated acoustically to reduce reverberation.  Distance is also a good strategy where feasible as sound intensity decreases with distance, provided that the room dimensions and surfaces are such that there is very little reverberation.

Sound-absorbent ceiling finishes should be used in key areas such as nurses’ rest rooms or waiting areas where infection control requirements would not be as critical. In areas where sound reduction rates highly as a requirement (e.g. ICU and general wards), then this factor would be listed as:

       •     High acoustic

9. Aesthetics

Research results from CABE (2004 and 2005), King’s Fund (2004) and Leather, Beale and Lee (2000) all highlight the need for an integrated, holistic and sympathetic hospital aesthetic.

Key results of a study by Becker and Douglass (2008), show that the physical appearance of the architectural setting, including finishes, has an effect on the patient’s experience as well as the recruitment and retention of staff –  happy staff are more motivated to care for patients, who in turn recover more quickly.

Reflectivity of the ceiling material can boost natural light in a room or alternately produce glare - both of which have a direct impact on the comfort levels in the room. By ensuring skylights are oriented correctly, and shaded appropriately, natural light could be introduced through the ceiling.

The ceiling surface finish should complement the function of the room, and monotony for the sake of economics should be avoided, bearing in mind that most patients will be focused on the ceiling for the duration of their stay.

Printed ceiling tiles, or polycarbonate panels with vinyl film images, behind which lighting can be introduced, could be used in key areas. This can transform a dull ward ceiling into a fascinating window to the outside world. CABE (2004) highlights the need for patients to have a ’connection with

nature’, and these ceiling ‘windows’ are the ideal opportunity to supplement views to the exterior.

Natural light is a key factor in creating an environment for patient recovery. The occupants of the ward should be considered – paediatric wards are opportunities for playful scenes that will help little patients feel at ease.

In public areas where more emphasis might be placed on an attractive and welcoming interior than other factors, then this factor would be listed as:

       •     High aesthetics

PART C -  TECHNICAL INFORMATION – CEILING TYPES

       1.        Paint on seamless plaster

Paint is easily applied by roller to a plastered ceiling soffit. The soffit could be constructed from plasterboard sheets, which are then skimmed or from concrete. Note that the structure onto which the plasterboard is fixed would need to be non-combustible if the facility is a hospital. Following a primer and undercoat, usually three coats of paint are applied.  Two-coat plaster or skimming is highly recommended prior to painting, as defects will be highlighted with the high-gloss type paints.  

Paint types that can be applied to the ceiling soffit will vary between oil-based and water-based types. Enamel paint dries to a hard, glossy, finish. It is usually oil-based. Velvet sheen paints are water-based, but produce a less glossy finish. PVA-paints are also water-based, but produce a matt finish. Paint is fairly inexpensive when compared to other ceiling finishes - excluding the structure.

Infection prevention

The smooth seamless finish produced by painted concrete or plasterboard ceilings, make this finish ideal for areas where infection prevention is paramount. There are no joints or crevices to encourage growth of microbes. Paints with nanotechnology enhancements are also being developed. These paints inhibit the growth of algae and fungus.

Cleaning and maintenance

The enamel and velvet sheen paints are highly washable, durable and stain-resistant. PVA can also be washed, but is not as stain-resistant. Paint is a low maintenance finish which may require re-application every few years, unless latent defects arise.

Access to services

Access panels need to be planned in the structure prior to painting. This leaves little flexibility in terms of access to services, and tricky patching if the ceiling ever needs to be altered. This type of ceiling is not ideal where access to services above is required.

Fire safety

Paint on a concrete soffit is considered a non-combustible finish as the thickness of the paint is usually less than

0.5 mm – refer to manufacturers’ specifications, and consult with the SANS Part T (4.13).

Indoor air quality: Humidity

Generally, paints are not adversely affected by a reasonable amount of moisture being generated by the presence of taps or wet fittings in a room. Enamel paints are most resistant to absorbing moisture, when compared to PVA-type paints.

Indoor air quality: Emissions and insulation

Paints are notorious for high VOC emissions, although manufacturers are now working on products with reduced or zero VOCs.  Refer to product specific literature.

Acoustics

The hard surface of painted soffits reflects sounds and where acoustics are important, there are certainly better options available.

Aesthetics

While paint can be used effectively to introduce colour for features or emphasis, generally on ceilings in areas where infection prevention is important, the ceilings should be kept single colours - white or light colours – this ceiling would be used in areas where aesthetics is not the highest priority.

2. Cementitious board – nail-up ceilings

General description and properties

Plain and textured ceiling boards are available for nail-up applications where joints are not a problem. These boards are manufactured from a combination of cement, silica and organic fibres. They are available in 4 and 6 mm thicknesses, and can be nailed at regular intervals to the overhead structure.

The joints between the ceiling boards can be finished using joiners or cover-strips. The ceiling boards can also be fixed between exposed beams.

Although no paint finish is required, paint can be applied. (Refer

to comments on paint on plaster above.)                                                                                        FIGURE 23

Infection prevention

The textured boards and the joining strips will create areas where microbes can grow. This ceiling finish is therefore not suitable for areas where infection prevention is critical.  

Cleaning and maintenance

Nail-up cementitious boards are unaffected by moisture and resistant to corrosion. When painted they are easy to clean and stain-resistant. They are relatively lightweight (compared to a concrete soffit), low maintenance and durable. Replacement is possible if boards do get damaged, but this would be disruptive to the functioning of the room.

Access to services

Access panels need to be planned in the structure prior to painting. This leaves little flexibility in terms of access to services, and tricky patching if the ceiling ever needs to be altered. This type of ceiling is not ideal where access to services above is required.

Fire safety

Nail-up cementitious boards are non-combustible.

Indoor air quality: Humidity

These painted boards are well-suited to areas of high humidity as they are not affected by moisture.

Indoor air quality: Emissions and insulation

These boards can be supplied with thermal insulation backing, which will reduce the heat load on the building from roof spaces where applicable. Fibres are safe and recyclable, and manufacturers claim low embodied energy used for assembly and construction. Refer to product specific literature. Emissions from paints should be considered.

Aesthetics

This type of ceiling board is aesthetically acceptable, and with paint, can be used to create an interesting functional ceiling. Acoustics

The hard surface reflects sound and will not aid in sound absorption in the room it covers.